Are Link Exchanges Bad for SEO? What a Reddit Thread Taught Us
Have you ever gotten an email? An email that says, “I’ll link to your website if you link to mine!” It sounds like a good deal. It seems like a fast and easy way to get better on Google.
But is it safe? Or is it a trap?
This is a huge question in the world of SEO. SEO means “Search Engine Optimization.” It’s the job of helping your website show up higher on Google. A person on the website Reddit asked this exact question. They were confused. They wanted to know if “backlink exchanges” are really that bad.
The short answer is yes, it’s a very risky idea.
Let’s break down the question, what experts say, and what you should do instead. We will use very simple words to make it all clear.
The Big Question: What Did the Redditor Ask?
The person who posted on Reddit (we’ll call them the OP, or “Original Poster”) had a good question.
Their story is pretty common. They run a blog about design and web development. They get a lot of emails every week. These emails all ask for the same thing: a “link swap” or “backlink exchange.”

The OP knew that some link-building tricks are bad. For example, they knew that “link farms” are terrible for SEO. A link farm is a big, low-quality website. Its only job is to link to thousands of other websites. Google hates these.
But the OP’s question was more specific. What about a simple, one-to-one swap?
Imagine this:
- I have a blog about food.
- You have a blog about cooking.
- I add a link to your blog.
- You add a link to my blog.
It’s just one link. It’s not a big, spammy farm. It even seems kind of fair.
The OP wanted to know: Is this simple 1-to-1 trade really bad? Or is it only bad when you do it hundreds of times?
This is where the confusion starts for many people. It feels like a “gray area.” But the advice from SEO experts is very clear.
Why People Say “Don’t Do It!”
When this question comes up, most SEO experts and experienced website owners say the same thing: “Stay away!”
It’s not about the number of links. It’s about the reason for the link. Letโs look at why it’s a bad idea.
It’s Against Google’s Rules
This is the biggest reason. Google has rules for all website owners. These rules are in a guide. They tell you what is okay and what is not okay.
In these rules, Google talks about “link schemes.” A link scheme is any method used to trick Google’s ranking system.
What does Google call a link scheme? Right in their rules, they say:
“Excessive link exchanges (‘Link to me and I’ll link to you’) or partner pages exclusively for the sake of cross-linking.”
The key word here is “excessive.” But many experts say any link swap that’s only for SEO is a risk. You are trying to “game” the system. You are not earning the link. You are trading for it. Google is very, very smart. Its computer programs can spot these patterns easily.
The Big Risk: A Google Penalty
So, what happens if Google thinks you are using a link scheme?
You could get a “penalty.”
A penalty is the worst thing that can happen to your website. It means Google punishes your site. This can happen in two ways:
- Your site ranks lower.ย Maybe you were on page 1 of Google. Now you are on page 10.
- Your site is removed.ย This is the worst. Your site vanishes from Google completely.
Many people in the Reddit discussion warned about this. They said the small, tiny boost you might get from a link swap is not worth the giant risk. You could lose all of your hard work. You could lose all your visitors. It is like betting your whole business on a single risky trick.
It’s Not a “Natural” Link
Think about why links exist. A link is supposed to be a “vote.”
When a website links to you, they are “voting” for your page. They are telling their readers, “This page is good! This page is helpful! You should go check it out.”
This is what Google wants to see. They call these “natural links.” You earn them by having great content.
A link swap is not a natural link. It’s not a real vote. It’s a fake trade. You are not saying, “This site is great.” You are saying, “You voted for me, so I’ll vote for you.”
Google’s whole job is to find the best and most trusted pages. Fake votes just get in the way. That’s why Google works so hard to ignore them or punish them.
Are Some Swaps Okay? The “Gray Area”

This is where the talk gets interesting. People always ask, “But what if…?”
What if the two sites are very related? What if the link is actually helpful for users?
The “Helpful” Link Idea
Let’s use an example.
- Imagine a local wedding cake baker.
- And a local wedding flower shop.
They are not rivals. They serve the same customers. Wouldn’t it make sense for the baker to have a “Partners” page? And on that page, they link to the flower shop? And the flower shop links back?
This seems okay. And in this one case, it might be. The main reason for the link is to help the user, not just to get SEO juice.
But even here, you have to be so careful. Most SEO experts would say this is still not the best way. If you do this with 100 other “partners,” it starts to look exactly like a link scheme again.
The safe bet? Link to other sites when they are great. Do it because you want to help your reader. Just don’t ask for a link back.
The Old “3-Way Link” Trick
Because Google got smart about 1-to-1 swaps, people invented a “smarter” trick. It’s called a “3-way link exchange.”
It works like this:
- Site Aย links toย Site B.
- Site Bย links toย Site C.
- Site Cย links back toย Site A.
See? It’s not a direct swap. Site A gets a link from Site C, but it gave a link to Site B. The idea was to hide the pattern from Google.
Does this work? No.
Google is not dumb. It can see these patterns, too. It’s just a more complex link scheme. This trick is very old. It stopped working many, many years ago. Trying this today is a great way to get a penalty. Don’t waste your time.
What to Do Instead: Safer Ways to Build Links
Okay, so if you can’t trade links, what can you do? How do you get good links?
The Reddit thread and most experts agree. There are two main ways. One is hard work. The other is veryhard work. Both are safe.
1. The Power of Guest Posting
This was the number one tip. It’s the most popular, “white-hat” (which means “safe and good”) way to build links.
Here’s how guest posting works:
- You find another blog in your niche. A blog that your readers would like.
- You write an amazing, original, helpful articleย for them.
- They post your article onย theirย site.
- In return, they let you put a link back toย yourย site. This is usually in a little “author bio” at the end. (e.g., “Jane is a writer at Jane’s Food Blog.”)
Why is this so much better?
- You give value first.ย You gave them a great, free piece of content.
- The link is a fair trade.ย It’s not a “scheme.” It’s payment for your hard work.
- It looks natural.
- It brings you new readers.ย People will read your article on their site and click to find yours.
This is the right way to “ask” for a link. You are not asking for a trade. You are asking to provide value.
2. Make Amazing, “Link-Worthy” Content
This is the best, purest, and hardest way to get links.
Just make your website awesome.
Focus 100% on your own blog. Write the best guides in your industry. Make the most helpful videos. Create cool, free tools. Answer every question a person could have.
When your content is truly the best, something magical happens. People find it. And when they find it, they link to it on their own.
You don’t have to ask. You don’t have to email anyone. You don’t have to trade.
They will link to you because your page is a great resource. They want to show their readers. These are called “natural links.” They are the most powerful links in all of SEO. One great natural link is worth more than 1,000 traded links.
One commenter on a similar thread said it perfectly: “Stop worrying about link building and start worrying about content building.”
Our Final Takeaway: What We Learned
So, what’s the final answer? Is backlink exchange really bad?
Yes. It is.
The lesson from this Reddit post and from SEO experts is very clear. Trading links is a “link scheme” in Google’s eyes. It’s an old trick that doesn’t work anymore.
The risk is just too high. You could get a penalty and lose everything you worked for.
Here are the main things to remember.
- DON’Tย reply to those “link exchange” emails. Just delete them.
- DON’Tย ever use a 3-way link trick or any other scheme.
- DOย focus on guest posting. Offer a great, free article in exchange for an author link.
- DOย make amazing, helpful content. This is the best way to earnย naturalย links.
- DOย link out to other sites… but only when it’s helpful for your reader. Don’t ask for one back.
Building a good website takes time. There are no fast shortcuts in SEO. The best plan is to play it safe. Focus on quality. Be helpful. That is the only way to win at SEO for a long, long time.
What’s your take on this? Have you ever been tempted by a link swap email? Share your thoughts in the comments!
Quick FAQs About Link Building
1. Is a single 1-to-1 link exchange really going to get me a penalty?
It could. While one swap is less risky than 100, it’s still against Google’s rules. It’s a bad habit to start. Experts agree it’s just not worth the risk.
2. What is better than a link exchange?
Guest posting is much better. You provide value (a free article) and get a link in return. The best thing is “natural” links, which you get by having amazing content that people want to link to.
3. What are “natural links”?
These are links you don’t ask for. Other people link to your website simply because your content is good, helpful, or interesting. These are the most valuable links for SEO.
4. Can Google really find link swaps?
Yes. Google’s systems are designed to find unnatural patterns. A 1-to-1 swap (Site A links to B, Site B links to A) is the easiest pattern to find. They can also find more complex rings and 3-way exchanges.
5. Is it okay to link to a related business?
This is a small gray area. If the link is truly helpful for your users (like a “Recommended Partners” page), it might be okay. But if you do this many times and it’s clear you’re just swapping for SEO, it becomes a risky link scheme.